Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence
نویسنده
چکیده
The anecdote is famous. A mathematician, Stan Ulam, once challenged Paul Samuelson to name one proposition in the social sciences that is both true and non-trivial. His reply was: ‘Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage’; see Paul Samuelson (1995, p. 22). Truth, however, in Samuelson’s reply refers to the fact that Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage is mathematically correct, not that it is empirically valid. The goal of this paper is to assess the empirical performance of Ricardo’s ideas. To bring Ricardo’s ideas to the data, one must overcome a key empirical challenge. Suppose, as Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage predicts, that different factors of production specialize in different economic activities based on their relative productivity differences. Then, following Ricardo’s famous example, if English workers are relatively better at producing cloth than wine compared to Portuguese workers, England will produce cloth, Portugal will produce wine, and at least one of these two countries will be completely specialized in one of these two sectors. Accordingly, the key explanatory variable in Ricardo’s theory, relative productivity, cannot be directly observed. This identification problem is emphasized by Alan Deardorff (1984) in his review of empirical work on the Ricardian model of trade (p. 476): “Problems arise, however, most having to do with the observability of [productivity by industry and country]. The...problem is implicit in the Ricardian model itself...[because] the model implies complete specialization in equilibrium... This in turn means that the differences in labor requirements cannot be observed, since imported goods will almost never
منابع مشابه
What Goods Do Countries Trade? a Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo’s Ideas
The Ricardian model predicts that countries should produce and export relatively more in industries in which they are relatively more productive. Though one of the most celebrated insights in the theory of international trade, this prediction has received little attention in the empirical literature since the mid-1960s. The main reason behind this lack of popularity is the absence of clear theo...
متن کاملThediscoveryof Comparative Advantage
Thus Jacob Viner (1937, p. 442) balanced the claims of E. R. A. Seligman for Robert Torrens against those of J. H. Hollander for David Ricardo. Lionel Robbins (1958) found rather more in Torrens, and J. Chipman (1965) also made much of his contribution. W. O. Thweatt (1976) made a small sensation when he attributed Ricardo’s formulation to James Mill, regarded only as a popularizer of Ricardo’s...
متن کاملWhy countries trade Insights from firm-level data
Two theories dominate economic thinking on the causes of international exchange. Comparative advantage explains trade by inherent differences between countries. Increasing returns explains trade by the productivity and variety advantages from specialization and exchange even among like economies. But one-hundred-eighty years after the publication of Ricardo’s “Principles,” and two decades into ...
متن کاملA New Method in Bankruptcy Assessment Using DEA Game Theory
One of the most important economic concepts is evaluation and bankruptcy prediction. Financial events, which an organization could be, exposed to serious risks and it goes bankruptcy. Therefore, prediction and assessment bankruptcy enable organizations that to be familiar the financial risks and resolve their financial deficiencies. So in this paper, we discuss one of the most important economi...
متن کامل